6 August 2009
National Student Survey shows increased participation and continued high levels of satisfaction among higher education students
Numbers of respondents to higher education's (HE) National Student Survey (NSS) were up this year, and four-fifths of students expressed satisfaction with the course they did.
The total number of students who responded to the fifth annual National Student Survey increased this year by over 3,000 to 223,363 students; this gives an overall response rate for the UK of 62 per cent. A total of 155 higher education institutions (HEIs) across the UK and 117 further education colleges (FECs) in England took part.
The survey shows that the overall satisfaction rate (Question 22 in the survey) for students studying HE in England remains high: 81 per cent said that they are satisfied with their course.
For the first time this year students studying NHS subjects were able to respond to the survey by phone and post, in addition to the online survey they have used in previous years. This change has meant an increase in the overall response rate from this group from 37 per cent last year, to 65 per cent this year.
This is the second year that students studying HE courses at English FECs have participated in the survey. Their overall satisfaction is 75 per cent, with participation in the NSS at 57 per cent.
2008 and 2009 National Student Survey results for students England
Questions 2008 NSS 2009 NSS % satisfied % satisfied 1-4 The teaching on my course 83 83 5-9 Assessment and feedback 64 65 10-12 Academic support 73 74 13-15 Organisation and management 72 72 16-18 Learning resources 81 80 19-21 Personal development 78 79 22 Overall satisfaction 82 81 The figures in the table are for students taught in England. The Unistats web-site gives data on all students in the survey, and will be available at the end of September 2009. It covers HE students in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and 12 Scottish universities, as well as students on HE courses at FECs in England. Responses from some students on initial teacher training courses and students studying NHS subjects will also be available.
HEFCE Chief Executive, Sir Alan Langlands, said:
'The increase in participation and the continued high levels of satisfaction in this year's National Student Survey results demonstrate the commitment of institutions to deliver learning and teaching which is meeting the needs of their students. In the coming months it will be important for institutions to look closely at the results and identify areas where improvements can be made.'
David Lammy, Minister of State for Higher Education, said:
‘High quality teaching is essential for a strong university sector, and it has never been more so than in the current climate where we want to ensure that students have the skills they need to progress and build up the UK's economy.
'Once again we are seeing students that are very satisfied, with over 80 per cent consistently rating their teaching experience highly. Five years of these high rates demonstrates that our higher education system is continuing to meet the challenge of providing a rewarding and quality experience to students across the country.'
Professor Paul Ramsden, CEO, Higher Education Academy, said:
'A high quality student experience is the hallmark of excellent higher education. With the current pressures on the sector, it is striking that the vast majority of students are positive about the teaching they receive and about their experiences generally. It's a tribute to the commitment of everyone who works in higher education, but it makes it even more important that we keep our eyes on the ball and continue to deliver really good teaching for all students.'
Professor Janet Beer, chair of the NSS steering group and Vice-Chancellor, Oxford Brookes University said:
’The increase in participation and continuing high levels of satisfaction demonstrate that students are engaging seriously with the survey as an important means by which to maintain and enhance the quality of their experience. There is a particularly pleasing upward trend in the percentage of students satisfied with the processes of assessment and feedback. This is an area in which universities are constantly – in partnership with their students - striving for improvement.’
Wes Streeting, President of the NUS, said:
'We are pleased that most students remain happy with the quality of university courses. However, we are concerned that the survey reveals a small dip in overall levels of satisfaction as the first group of students to pay top up fees prepared to graduate. There is clearly no room for complacency on the part of universities, who have a responsibility to improve standards in accordance with their increased resources.'
Notes
1. The threshold for publication of NSS results is at least 50 per cent response rate with at least 23 students responding.
2. The NSS survey covers nearly all final year undergraduates studying for higher education qualifications at HEIs and FECs in England, HEIs in Wales and Northern Ireland, 12 institutions in Scotland, and the independent University of Buckingham. Students on initial teacher training courses funded by the Training and Development Agency for Schools and students studying NHS subjects are also included.
3. The percentages in the table include students studying at the Open University.
4. NSS data are available on the HEFCE web-site.
5. The NSS was carried out by Ipsos MORI. The data are available for prospective students, their parents and advisors, and will be made available on the Unistats web-site at the end of September 2009. Unistats is developed and maintained by UCAS and Hotcourses.
A very high-level summary of the results of the National Student Satisfaction Survey (in England) has been published on the HEFCE website. What's interesting is that assessment and feedback seems to be the most unsatisfactory feature - 65% compared to 70s and 80s for other aspects. The broadsheets make very small percentage differences in individual college scores on this survey to make really important changes in the rankings for Universities in the league tables. But this particular issue, one I know is influencing policy at Swansea, seems to be a universal problem for HE institutions.
Comments [0]
Comments [0]

Comments [2]
Name: Posterous URL: http://posterous.com/share?linkto=${url}&title=${title} Icon URL: http://posterous.com/images/favicon.png
Comments [0]
The pinnacle for secondary mathematics (that is what everyone should know) should be statistics not calculus. It would kill scare-story journalism and politicians' love of percentages overnight!
Comments [0]
Clay Shirky on TED talks. To paraphrase: New media becomes world changing when it becomes invisible.
Comments [0]
An unexpected feature of Blackboard that was reported by an ex student. Once the student (and presumably the staff that created a course) leaves the University, all his/her notes disappear into a black hole. (In fact in our case, student access is cancelled 6 months after a module is examined!) Perhaps that's why Blackboard and its ilk are so attractive to our masters who seem so keen to hang on to our intellectual property. Roll on Open Content ...
Here is an anecdote (it happened to me today) outlining just one of the many things that is wrong with closed class websites and LMS in general:
I am currently working at a software company as an intern, writing a program. Now of course, as anybody who has taken Software Engineering knows (don’t worry readers who are not in Computer Science, I promise I will not lose you), when you make software you have to provide different types of documentation about it. Things like, why you made it, how it works, how to use it, who is going to use it… all these things and many more have to be written down formally and saved somewhere in order for your software to live a long and happy life.
Now, Software engineering (CPSC 310) is a class that in part teaches you how to write all of this essential documentation. I took this course with Meghan Allen, one of my favorite professors simply for the fact that she teaches like a human being and not an automaton. This is post is no reflection on her, just on the system that she is pushed into using by those above her . Anyway, in the course she would explain why this documentation was needed and how to do it. She would then provide us with careful examples of what it should look like. We were asked to use her examples as reference when creating our own documentation for our class project.
So far so good, pretty normal learning experience. But, we skip ahead to right now. My little program that I am writing for this big software company needs documentation. I remember why, but am very fuzzy on how. What to do? Of course, I can just go back to the example from class an… but wait. The examples were posted in Blackboard. I can’t see them anymore. They were a great resource… utterly useless as I have no way of applying it to a real life situation.
Ok, Well, not utterly useless. I still have the assignment that I handed in (thanks Google Docs for keeping it safe for me). I could still google the type of documentation and find other examples online, which works, although it takes time (less time of course than writing this post). The thing is, I know that the document is a fantastic resource, why should I have to go and search for others? Shouldn’t the university-provided example be better than most things I can find online anyway? Isn’t that the point of somone spending time writing it up in the first place? Money was used to create that example (mine and the government’s) so why should it be a one-time deal used only to help me complete an assignment? Can anybody come up with a sane reason why it should not be available to me always? I feel ripped off, because I had a resource and it was snatched away from me. If it had been given to me in good old-fashioned paper handouts, I would still have it.
This is just one example amongst a sea of them that I am sure most students experience often. I guess most don’t even realize that they are getting a raw deal for the time effort and money they put into the classroom. In three years of university I have taken well over 10 courses with Blackboard components. What do I have to show for it? See for yourself. Below is my list of blackboard courses. Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside doesn’t it?
Comments [2]
A cool video of a Google Wave application that helps with citing. Found in a blog posting by Alan Carr.
Comments [0]
Please, oh please don't invest in this software!
I recently mentioned that my paper on “From Web accessibility to Web adaptability” had been published in a special issue of the Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology journal. Shortly after receiving the notification that the paper had been published I deposited the author’s version of the paper in Opus, the University of Bath Institutional Repository. As I had attended a short training course on use of Opus (which uses the ePrints repository software) a few hours before uploading the paper to the repository I decided to time how long it took to complete the process.
I discovered it took me 16 minutes to do this. As someone responded to my tweet about this, this seemed too long. I subsequently discovered that I had mistakenly chosen the New Item option – as a DOI for the paper was available I should have selected the Import Items option (not an intuitive name, I feel). In addition I also copied the list of 46 references and tried to apply some simple formatting (line breaks between items) to the list and also to the abstract. This was a mistake, as any line breaks appear to be ignored.
In order to understand what I should have done, I went through the deposit process a second time and this time recorded my actions, with an accompanying commentary as a screencast which is available on YouTube and embedded below.
The video lasts for 10 minutes and the deposit process took 7 minutes (although this includes the time taken in giving the commentary and showing what I did the first time).
It does occur to me that it might be useful to make greater use of screencasting not only as a training aid for institutional repository staff to demonstrate the correct processes for depositing items but also to allow authors themselves to show and describe the approaches they take. I’m sure that some of the mistakes I made are due to limitations of the user interface and I won’t be alone in making such mistakes. Indeed having shown this view to the University of Bath’s institutional repository manager she commented:
I’ve also noticed, from your video a few issues that should be fixed, so it was helpful to see.
Why aren’t we making more screencasts available of user interactions with the services we develop, I wonder? And why aren’t we sharing them?

Comments [0]
Comments [0]