Half baked but crispy

Another Chris P. Jobling blog 

The Guardian's technology coverage: what happens next | Technology | The Guardian

What you're holding in your hands – assuming you're reading this in print form, which a substantial number of you are – is a collector's item. Guardian Technology, in its print incarnation, is to cease publication. The last edition will be on 17 December.

Technology front

This does not mean the Guardian is abandoning its technology coverage; far from it. For example, our award-winning games coverage (the 2009 winner, for the third year running, of the Games Media Awards for coverage in a national newspaper) will continue with reviews, blogposts and features. So will our coverage of gadgets, and the Ask Jack column (which has been running online as a blog since 2005), and our in-depth features and coverage of all the important issues in technology.

The final issue will mark just over 26 continuous years since Futures Micro Guardian had its first edition, on 20 October 1983. (It was a Thursday; the publication date of this section has remained unchanged.) From then, you will continue to find our writing online, or through our Twitter feed, and also throughout the paper incarnations of the Guardian in the news, business, features and other sections, where we will have a renewed focus on bringing you our take on the technology issues that truly matter and which you should know about.

That said, I am sure that many of you will feel the absence of the physical manifestation of the Technology section — which among its former incarnations has been called Futures Micro Guardian, Computer Guardian and Online, before taking up its current naming in 2005 in order to reflect our wider coverage of all sorts of technology, not just that which comes through a browser. The latter is, of course, still enormously important, given the key part that the internet plays in all our lives.

In part it has been the internet that has hastened the end of the physical version of this section, as more classified job adverts have migrated to online job sites such as Guardian Jobs (jobs.guardian.co.uk, in case you're looking); there have also been the arctic winds of the recession, which seems to be hitting the UK harder than many other countries around the world.

But it would be foolish to resist the tide; we prefer to swim with it, and the purpose of this section has always been to teach our readers how to manage technology, what to expect, what to watch out for, and where to look for further advice. We've also tried to be guided by the feedback you have given us – through the letters and more recently emails, and then blogs and most recently Twitter remarks that you've written.

The huge advantage of going online, of course, is that it frees us from the space constraints of print – games and gadget reviews can be longer and more plentiful, features are untroubled by the tyranny of the word count, and interactivity comes to the fore, both in how we present data and how you can respond and inform us about the topics you find interesting and important.

There is still plenty more to tell you: there are issues left unsolved (such as the Free Our Data campaign, which as you will see is still gaining momentum right at the top of government), and topics that we know you'll want to have answered. We know that there's a huge swathe of readers for whom Ask Jack has been a weekly lifeboat; that fact is evidenced by the continuing stream of queries and cries for help that we receive.

But having said that, we'd like to ask for your help. We're sure that you have stories that you'd like to tell us about how this section has affected your life over the past two decades. Has it helped you find a job? Start a company? Shaped your life in some important way? We'd like to know: email us at tech@guardian.co.uk with the subject line "Guardian Technology memories". We'll try to use the best in one of the last issues that we produce. And with your help, we'll make it one to keep for a long, long time.

• Charles Arthur is editor of the Guardian's technology coverage

I'm a part-time Guardian reader and full-time technophile so I look forward to Thursdays when I buy a copy of The Guardian for the Technology section -- sometimes that's the only bit I actually read. I was saddened, therefore, to read in last Thursday's section an article from the Guardian's technology editor that the Technology section will no longer be printed and that the last article will be on 17th December. The Guardian's excellent technology coverage will continue to appear in the regular paper, and of course, on-line. As I listen to the Podcast, follow the blog, and subscribe to the twitter feed, I'll probably continue to get my regular fix of Guardian Tecky goodness. Just not over a Massimo Latte in the library coffee shop!

Comments [1]

Hello, open source developers. Would you like to help build an operating system for web users?

Hello, open source developers. Would you like to help build an operating system for web users?

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Today we announced the Chromium OS project on the Official Google Blog. This release of Chromium OS includes:
We are doing this early, almost a year before Google Chrome OS will be ready for users, because we are eager to engage with open source developers. There are many of you who share our passion for creating a new model of computing. Chromium OS makes it possible for any interested developer to contribute code, ideas and designs to help shape the future of personal computing.

Speed, simplicity and security are fundamental to Chrome OS. We wanted to talk about these areas in a bit more detail.

Speed

Simplicity

Security

Open Source

We expect to publish additional design docs and documentation in the upcoming few months. You can track what we're doing on this blog and we hope you will join us in this effort.

Posted by Glen Murphy, Martin Bligh, Will Drewry, Software Engineers

Interesting new blog from the Chrome OS team. This post contains videos explaining some of the concepts that are being thought about in the context of the design of the Chrome OS.

Comments [0]

A people's history of the internet: from Arpanet in 1969 to today

A people's history of the internet: from Arpanet in 1969 to today

To mark the 40th anniversary of the first stirrings of the internet we asked you to tell us your experiences of life online. Hundreds of you responded, and here we present an interactive documentary of your stories and videos, alongside our own research and interviews with key figures (About this project)

Why does so much interesting stuff happen when there's a nine in the year? This year it's been the anniversary of the start of WWII (70 years), my own half century (7th May 1959), the Apollo moon landings (40 years); the world-wide web and the fall of the Berlin wall (20 years) and now the Internet (40 years on October 29th). To celebrate the latter, The Guardian has published a number of articles, including this fascinating interactive time line, and we can be pretty sure that there'll be more to come over the next week or so. (Of my own anniversary, the least said the better!)

Comments [0]

(Jane's e-Learning Pick of the Day) 10 Tools for (20)10

I have just completed a short article for the November edition of e.learning age magazine.

e.learning age is the UK’s number one media resource for the e-learning community.  The magazine is the only one if its kind for anyone involved in the e-learning industry - from board directors responsible for skilling the workforce, to training and HR professionals choosing and implementing the best systems, to vendors who want to find out the latest news and trends in the industry.   

In my article I highlight 10 of the new tools appearing on the emerging Top 100 Tools for Learning 2009 list that I think are useful, innovative, cost effective and worth considering by workplace learning and development professionals for 2010.

What are the 10 tools? Take a look at my article here:  10 Tools for 20(10)

 

Interesting list of new stuff. I think that the Learning Lab might agree with the last 5: screenr, posterous, yammer, wordle and flip. I've tried prezi myself but I'm not so sure that it's much more than a gimmick: it takes quite a lot of effort and the editing tools are quite limited!

Has anyone tried any of the other four tools?

Comments [0]

(Press release from youthnet.org) New report reveals young people's 'hybrid lives'

Young people have evolved to communicate in more advanced ways than older generations, living 'hybrid lives' where the internet plays a critical role, says a new report launched at the House of Commons [on October 14, 2009].

The report Life Support: Young people's needs in a digital age looks at how digital communications have impacted on the psychological and neurological behaviour of young people - and the challenge this poses for agencies and organisations who aim to support them.

Undertaken by Professor Michael Hulme [...] the report draws together literature and new research conducted with 994 young people aged 16 to 24 (funded by Nominet Trust). It found that of the young people surveyed:

  • 75% said that they couldn't live without the internet
  • 45% said that they felt happiest when online
  • 32% agreed with the statement: 'I can access all the information I need online, there is no need to speak to a real person about my problems'
  • Four in five (82%) said they had used the internet to look for advice and information for themselves and 60% had for other people
  • 37% said that they would use the internet to give advice to others on sensitive issues. 

Government Advisor on Children and Technology, Professor Tanya Byron, welcomed the report, saying: "This research illustrates the vital role the internet plays in the lives of young people. Far more than just a way to keep in touch – it, and its online population, have become a confidant for young people facing difficult, stressful or confusing times. 

The ease of access to opinion, support and advice is of course appealing to a generation who have grown up with immediacy, but it's essential the adults and organisations that provide support to this age group recognise this, and offer services that are easily accessible through the internet."

 

Read full press release at youthnet.org

This report was mentioned in the Click On item on "Digital Natives" (see previous post) in which Michael Hulme appeared with James Clay on the programme. The report itself is available to download as a PDF.

Comments [0]

BBC - BBC Radio 4 Programmes - Click On, Series 5, Episode 3

Digital Natives

A just-published report into the technology habits of 16-24 year olds revealed that half of those asked felt happiest online, and three quarters of them couldn’t live without the internet. Simon is joined by the report's author Michael Hulme, and James Clay, manager of e-learning at Gloucestershire College - an institution which found that embracing social networking sites reduced their dropout rates - to discuss why it's important to recognise the needs of today's teens

The item starts at about 19 minutes. Broadcast on BBC Radio 4's Click-On show on Monday 19th October 2009 bwteen 16.30 and 17.00 GMT+1. All editions from the current (5th series) are available as are a couple of episodes from series 4. There's also a Podcast feed  which makes the last episode available for a week. But there's no apparent restriction on how long you can keep the MP3 files.

Comments [0]

Learn jQuery with FireBug, jQuerify and SelectorGadget

Proof of my contention that Firebug is the tool of choice for web developers and for teaching! Thanks to Rob Saddler for sharing.

See also http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmaUW86RqbY.

Comments [0]

Paul C. Manning’s Blog » Google Wave - A step up the federation ladder

... Furthermore there’s scope for building an MLE on top of the same federation framework, making inter-institution courses simple- e.g. outside tutor commenting on student work directly?

Scope for a University project here I feel!

I wonder if there's anyone interested in Paul Manning's contention that you could build a MLE on Google Wave!

Comments [0]

Attitudes to online assignment handling

As part of Cascade we are updating our online assignment handling system.  Currently the vast majority of assignments in the department are handled in hard copy, so that making this service available more widely will be a big change for many of our students, administrators and academics if they use it.

In our relatively informal consultations up to this point we have encountered widely differing reactions to the prospect of moving this online, both negative and positive and we are now moving forward with a more systematic survey in this area. As part of this we are trying to come up with a list of  attitudes which stakeholders can indicate agreement with or not – we started out with about 5 statements each for academics and students but since consulting a bit more are now up to well over 10 for each.

 Academic statements

  1. Many of my students hand write assignments
  2. I would be technically confident handling assignments online
  3. I am confident that online assignment handling is secure
  4. I do not want to spend more time at a screen
  5. I think that online assignment submission would speed up the marking process
  6. I would welcome being able to use plagiarism detection software
  7. I am worried about having to remember more passwords
  8. I think typing feedback will take longer than writing it by hand
  9. I am worried about students submitting assignments in file types I cannot read
  10. I do not want to have to print out assignments
  11. I am worried about having a good enough computer to deal with marking assignments online
  12. In my subject it is difficult produce electronic assignments e.g. maths notation or Cyrillic script
  13. I am worried that online submission will make it easier to plagiarise
  14. I think online assignment submission will be more stressful for student

Student statements

  1. I currently hand write my assignments
  2. I would be confident about the security of submitting my assignments online
  3. I have the technical skills to submit an assignment online
  4. If I submitted an assignment online, I would like to receive confirmation of receipt by email
  5. I would welcome the additional time the option of online submission would offer in meeting a deadline
  6. I would be happy to receive my work back electronically
  7. I think that online assignment submission would speed up turnaround of my assignments
  8. I prefer handwritten comments on my assignment
  9. I find typed feedback easier to read
  10. I currently submit my assignments by hand
  11. I currently submit my assignments by post

We are hopeful we have captured the most common attitudes, but it is hard to balance the positive and negative and there is always the worry that this will draw attention to points of view that would have never have occurred to our stakeholders if we had not brought it up.  If anyone has any experience in this area and can suggest anything they found useful it would be great to hear from you.

This entry was posted by Marion Manton on Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009 at 11:44 am and is filed under Cascade, assessment, conted. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

I wonder if this is any way relevant to the HEFCW eMark project?

Comments [0]

'Mozilla Labs » Blog Archive » Introducing Ubiquity'

From the page Mozilla Labs » Blog Archive » Introducing Ubiquity:

I emailed this from ubiquity by typing Ctrl-Space email post@posterous

Comments [0]